July 22, 2021 • Third Third Journal
If you Google on “retirement” and “Bible,” you’ll find some folks who say “There is no retirement in the Bible.” Alongside this claim they’ll point to biblical characters like Abraham and Sarah who lived well past 100 years without retiring from their faithful response to God’s call. Then there was Moses, who led the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt when he was 80 and who died at 120 with good eyesight and plenty of physical vigor. I’m not making this up. It’s right there in Deuteronomy 34:7.
The Retiring Levites
Careful students of the Bible, though basically agreeing with the claims of the anti-retirement crowd, rightly point out what seems to be the one exception to the “no retirement” rule. In Numbers 8:23-26, the Lord spells out a particular season of life during which the Levites are supposed to do their distinctive work in the tabernacle. They are to labor in Levitical service beginning at age 25 and ending at 50: “From the age of fifty years they shall retire from the duty of the service and serve no more.” They were permitted, however, to “assist their [Levitical] brothers in the tent of meeting in carrying out their duties.” But the 50-and-over Levites “shall perform no service.”
Old Testament scholars explain this unusual stipulation by pointing to the physical labor demanded of Levites, who were, among other things, in charge of the furnishings of the tabernacle (Num 3:5-10). This was hard manual labor, the kind of work that younger men would be able to do better than most older men. So, in a way, the prescribed retirement of the Levites was God’s gracious provision for them.
Nevertheless, the Levites were allowed to “assist their brothers,” meaning the younger Levites between the ages of 25 and 50. The exact nature of this assistance isn’t clear. Some commentators believe that the Levites assumed a kind of mentoring role, but this seems to be reading into the text what isn’t clearly there. It’s possible, but not certain.
Until recently, I was satisfied with the idea that retirement is addressed in only one passage of Scripture. Truly, the verb “to retire,” literally in Hebrew “to return” (shub), appears only in Numbers 8 concerning older adults ending a particular kind of work. But I believe other passages in the Bible, while not addressing retirement explicitly, do envision something like retirement and do remind us of several crucial aspects of transitions in the third third of life.
I came to this realization through my recent devotional journey with the Old Testament prophet Elijah (thanks to Lectio 365). As you may recall, after Elijah led a miraculous, victorious battle with the prophets of Baal, his life was threatened by the evil queen Jezebel (1 Kings 18:20-19:3). So Elijah escaped into the wilderness, making a 40-day trek to “Horeb, the mount of God” (19:8). There, while hiding in a cave, God was revealed to Elijah in “a sound of sheer silence” (19:12). The Lord gave Elijah new instructions, which involved anointing several future leaders, including “Elisha son of Shaphat of Abel-meholah as prophet in your place” (19:16). Elijah was to identify and authorize his prophetic replacement.
Elijah traveled to where Elisha was plowing a field and “threw his mantle over him” as a sign of the authority being invested in Elisha (19:19). Elisha, in response, said goodbye to his family, offered his farm equipment and animals in sacrifice to God, and “set out and followed Elijah, and became his servant” (19:21). Though Elijah had given his prophetic mantle to Elisha, the older prophet wasn’t done with his own prophetic career. With Elisha accompanying him as his servant, Elijah continued to prophesy until, finally, he was taken up into heaven in a chariot of fire (2 Kings 2:11). After this, Elisha took up the mantle of Elijah, both literally and figuratively as he began his prophetic service.
Scripture does not say that Elijah retired. He continued to prophesy right up to the end of his life. Yet, he knew for sure that his prophetic activity was coming to an end, which explains his passing of the mantle to Elisha. Moreover, in the time after that symbolic consecration, Elijah surely mentored Elisha, in word and deed.
The “Retirements” of Samuel and Moses
A century and a half earlier, the prophet Samuel had passed the torch to his chosen replacements as he grew old. According to 1 Samuel 8:1, “When Samuel became old, he made his sons judges over Israel,” effectively retiring from his position as judge/ruler of Israel. The Living Bible translation, “In his old age, Samuel retired and appointed his sons as judges in his place,” reads more into the text than is there, but gets the main idea right. Unfortunately, however, Samuel’s sons were not up to the job. They “did not follow in his ways, but turned aside after gain; they took bribes and perverted justice” (1 Sam 8:3). I have to wonder if Samuel had adequately trained and mentored his sons. Perhaps he “retired” prematurely.
Moses did a much better job passing on his leadership role to a younger person, Joshua. Years before Moses was about to die, he had given Joshua considerable authority (Exod 17:8-10). He took Joshua along with him when he went up Mt. Sinai to receive the law (24:12). Moses shared life and leadership with Joshua, though always as the primary leader (33:11). When it was almost time for Israel to enter the Promised Land, Moses gave Joshua a crucial mission and he fulfilled it in an exemplary fashion (Num 11:28, 14:30).
Shortly before Moses was going to die, the Lord said to him, “Take Joshua son of Nun, a man in whom is the spirit, and lay your hand upon him; have him stand before Eleazar the priest and all the congregation, and commission him in their sight. You shall give him some of your authority, so that all the congregation of the Israelites may obey” (Num 27:18-20). According to God’s instruction, Moses made a public display of authorizing Joshua by laying his hands on him in front of the priest and the congregation of Israel. Joshua, whom Moses had carefully groomed for leadership, was now seen as the divinely-ordained successor to Moses. Yet he was given only “some” of Moses’s authority. Whereas Moses talked to God face-to-face, Joshua needed to consult with the high priest in order to fully discern God’s will.
What We Learn from the “Retirements” of Elijah, Samuel, and Moses
I am not claiming that Elijah, Samuel, and Moses “retired” in the way we often use that word. They did not stop working so they could spend the rest of their days enjoying life. But they were intentional about passing their authority to those who would come after them. Elijah and Moses didn’t just authorize their successors, but also prepared them for effective leadership. Elijah and Moses commissioned their successors publicly so as to support and empower them for their leadership roles.
Elijah and Moses teach us a lot about ending well in our work. Their example encourages us to think about whom we are mentoring, whom we are preparing for future leadership. Of course, many of us won’t be in a position to name and commission our workplace successors. But we can still find younger people in whom to invest our lives so that they might flourish in theirs. This, it seems to me, is an essential part of finishing well, whether it’s directly connected to retiring from a job or not.
It strikes me as particularly sad that Samuel was not successful in passing on his leadership to his successors, especially because they were his own sons. Since we don’t know how Samuel had related to them earlier in life, I’m not necessarily criticizing Samuel. He may have done everything he should and could have done to prepare his sons for faithful leadership. Sometimes those we mentor and train don’t turn out so well, even when they’re our own children. But what happened to Samuel’s sons reminds me to be sure, as I’m getting ready to pass the torch to others, that I’m not neglecting my own kin in the process, my sons and daughters, my grandchildren, and/or others in my extended family.
My Experience of a Leadership Transition
I can relate personally to some of what I read in Scripture about leadership transitions, not that I’m planning to retire from my work any time soon. And I’m really hoping that I’m not going to retire anytime soon in the way of Moses (by dying). For what it’s worth, I’m not ready for Elijah’s fiery chariot ride to Heaven, either. Of course, I don’t know what the future holds. But I’m hopeful that I’ll continue to work as part of the De Pree Center for quite a few more years.
However, as you may already know, I have recently passed my “mantle” to a younger leader, choosing to step back from the role of Executive Director in order to become a Senior Strategist, focusing on the spiritual formation of leaders and the De Pree Center’s “third third” initiative. I am pleased that the new Executive Director of the center is someone I had the privilege of hiring, encouraging, mentoring, and partnering with for three years, not unlike what Moses may have done with Joshua and Elijah may have done with Elisha. Michaela O’Donnell Long is not only someone I’ve had the pleasure of knowing and helping to promote. She is also my boss and an awfully good one at that. In a way, though I passed fifty several years ago, I’m rather like the Levites in that I am now in a position of assisting Michaela in her executive leadership of the De Pree Center while not exercising that level of leadership myself.
But, as much as I am delighted to have Michaela as my boss and am pleased to support her leadership, I would confess that it has sometimes felt strange to step back and down. I was raised, schooled, and enculturated to believe that successful people move up the career ladder, not down. I have been blessed to mentor many people over the years, but this is the first time I have intentionally stepped down to make room for someone who becomes my boss. (In the 1980s I supervised Tod Bolsinger, who was my boss at Fuller from 2017 to 2020. But there was a thirty-year gap between my supervising Tod and his supervising me.)
I am not suggesting that every person in the third third of life should step down from their positions of authority. Some will rightly continue to lead from the top, as it were, because that’s consistent with their particular calling. But I do believe that, as we think about the transitions in work and life that come with aging, no matter whether we use the language of retirement or not, we should be intentional about investing in younger folk, whether they are our direct reports, our colleagues, our mentees, our children, our grandchildren, or students in the local elementary school. Scripture helps us see that retirement isn’t just about us. It’s also about others whom we can support, encourage, mentor, and, in some cases, commission for their own leadership.
Thus, whether you’re thinking about retiring from your primary job or planning to continue on for many years, if you’re in the third third of life, perhaps it’s time for you to invest your life and leadership in one or more younger people. Who are your younger Levites? Your Elisha? Your Joshua? What might God be calling you to do for them?
Dr. Mark D. Roberts is a Senior Strategist for Fuller’s Max De Pree Center for Leadership, where he focuses on the spiritual development and thriving of leaders. He is the principal writer of the daily devotional, Life for Leaders, and the founder of the De Pree Center’s Flourishing in the Third Third of Life Initiative. Previously, Mark was the Executive Director of the De Pree Center, the lead pastor of a church in Southern California, and the Senior Director of Laity Lodge in Texas. He has written eight books, dozens of articles, and over 2,500 devotions that help people discover the difference God makes in their daily life and leadership. With a Ph.D. in New Testament from Harvard, Mark teaches at Fuller Seminary, most recently in his D.Min. cohort on “Faith, Work, Economics, and Vocation.” Mark is married to Linda, a marriage and family counselor, spiritual director, and executive coach. Their two grown children are educators on the high school and college level.
I agree with and appreciate what you are saying. I think there is also another perspective on “retirement” that isn’t at odds with your post. At this point in time my pastoral status is officially “honorably retired”. For me this is more of an issue of how I “earn my living” than of being able to “quit work” and take it easy. I have transitioned over the years from engineer to pastor to mission worker to three different mission “bureaucrat” positions, and most recently to being able to continue aspects of the latter while engaging in other forms of ministry—without any income strings attached. And this has involved some of the things you mention, such as working with younger leaders. So in one way “retirement” was simply the latest transition in ministry, while in another way it was an official change of status with the denomination and the government!
Don’t forget about Simeon and Anna . They served at least until their time of Christ’s arrival.
Simeon was then ready to depart in peace. 😊
I have long appreciated Earl Palmer’s perspective on “living rhythmically.” We were created to work six days and rest on the seventh, for the whole of our lives. What changes over time is the arena in which we live and work and the nature of the work. So, as I turn 70, I may “retire” from 24/7 pastoral ministry for which I’m paid and shift into a life of “giving away” ministry or being paid small stipends for part-time ministry gigs, and devoting more time to being a hands-on grandfather. So, “familying” could become a larger share of my work.
Good afternoon Pastor Joe, firstly I’m really glad you are not going to ride into the sunset and disappear, you have been a great leader and have given me new thoughts and insight to a Christian life. Ok now as I read this article from Third third it is kind of not real clear to me what capacity you will do, but I’m not needing to understand that now. Time for that later. Do I understand that you will be encouraging us more “mature” Christians to become more involved in being mentors of a sort to the younger generation. If so that sounds very interesting but also kind of scary to me. I don’t feel equipped to mentor another person. But hey let’s see where you take us “mature” folks. Anything you plan for us will be an adventure. So lets go.. Respectfully Catherine Haspert.
One of the greatest joys I have in my workplace is the ability to mentor young people and watch them grow, sometimes even grow out of our organization. It will be no surprise to me that someday one of these young people will be my boss! Thanks for wrapping the stories of scripture around what we know as succession planning.
you do NOT have your scripture interpretation correct regarding 1 Kings 19:12. I looked it up and it says NOTHING about so called “sheer silence”. It says “still small voice”. Get it right brother. If you are going to post something and expect us to take heed to what you are saying, it is IMPERATIVE to get your scripture right. Extrememe difference between deafening silence and someone whispering! This is as important as the day is long. Get it right dude!
you are wrong about 1 Kings 19:12. It says “still small voice”, says nothing about “sheer silence”. I take issue with this because it is Not accurate> Major difference between the two which changes the meaning of that particular scripture. This is extremely important. Please be accurate. Thankyou. Whispering is Not the same as being completely silent.
Hello, Marge. Thanks for your careful reading, both of this devotion and, more importantly, of the Bible. So, I use the NRSV translation of the Bible. It’s generally quite reliable. That’s where the expression “a sound of sheer silence” appears. The classic and beloved expression, “still, small voice” appears in the KJV translation. I checked the Hebrew original and found that it has a variety of possibilities, including both “sound of sheer silence” and “still small voice.” If you look at other English translations, you find, “a gentle whisper” (NIV, NLT), “a sound. Thin. Quiet” (CEB), “the sound of a low whisper” (ESV), “a gentle and quiet whisper” (Message). Most of these translations maintain the sense of a quiet voice, not just the lack of sound. I still prefer “still, small voice” because of its accuracy and poetry. But, even if you go with silence, in the very next verse God speaks. So we haven’t lost the voice of God in this passage. I’m inclined to prefer “voice” over “silence” for this contextual reason. I didn’t talk about this in the devotion because I was simply noting the passage, not interpreting it.
Marge, I hope this helps.